![]() ![]() Like Agway Energy Services, LLC, PULP never expressed concern with the substance of the responses provided by Robison until its Motion, and further filed no motion to compel as to Robison. "PULP’s Motion is unwarranted, and should accordingly be denied. Instead, Robison encourages PULP to withdraw its Motion and join Robison in focusing its attention on the substantive issues under review in this proceeding," Robison said in its filing With its limited resources, Robison does not have the luxury of engaging in petty motion practice, and at this time, is not requesting sanctions, fees and costs against PULP. Indeed, Robison is disappointed that PULP chose to air its concerns with Robison’s previous responses to the ALJs directly instead of to Robison itself. "Robison, a small family owned ESCO, remains committed to engaging in meaningful dialogue with Commission Staff, consumer protection advocates, and industry colleagues on the substantive questions posed by the Commission in its December 2 Order. a filing with the New York PSC responding to a motion for sanctions filed by the Public Utility Law Project due to an alleged failure to abide by a discovery order, Robison Energy LLC called PULP's motion, "petty," and sought denial of the motion, reporting that it acted in good faith with respect to PULP's discovery requests and filed a supplemental response on August 25.ESCO Calls PULP Motion for Sanctions, "Petty," Says Supplemental Discovery Responses ProvidedĬopyright 2010-17 Energ圜
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |